>>On 24 June 2015 at 14:51, Marc Mamin <m.ma...@intershop.de> wrote:
>>note that the 345MB text only contains 635 lines. This might be the issue...
>There's similar issue discussed here:
>http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6046.1353874...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>Tom did seem to accept that the attempted alloc is larger than it needs to be,
>but even if it were fixed you would still run into problems further down the
>line managing values of that size.
Thanks,
does it means that the issue would also occur in a (not yet existing) function
that would just count the substring, without having to manipulate the text
itself ?
or in other words, are there string functions that can handle such large text
in stream, or is it always necessary to alloc enough memory for the whole text
first ?
Marc
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
