And are your colleagues offering to pay for an Oracle license? > On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:52 AM, pinker <pin...@onet.eu> wrote: > > Pavel Stehule wrote >> PLpgSQL doesn't check a identifiers inside embedded SQL before execution. >> In this case j_var can be theoretically some SQL identifiers - the >> possibility or impossibility is not know in function validation stage. >> >> It has some plus and minus points. The plus - there are not strong >> dependency between database objects and PL code. The minus - lot of bugs >> are not detected in validation stage. But this issue can be solved by >> plpgsql_check extension https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/ > > Thank you for the link to extension. > Another minus is that my colleagues which use to work on oracle think that > postgresql is at least one league below oracle. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://postgresql.nabble.com/Error-prone-compilation-of-stored-procedure-tp5856699p5856708.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
