On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Although it has been previously disregarded, I would like to second the > motion that all further discussion regarding the CoC go to it's own list. > > Consider this. > 1. The Coc will eventually apply to ALL PostgreSQL mail lists. > 2. There will be a need to have additions and revisions to the Coc. > 3. As this list is for General (and mostly technical discussions) further > discussions/emails concerning the CoC only distracts from the purpose of > this email list. > > Complete agreement. I've kept my hands silent through force of will. Those who are interested can create a CoC to their heart's content. I will abide by it or not as I decide. But I try to be acceptably pleasant in all discussions, even when I disagree with someone. This thread has been a completely useless; requiring extreme use of my delete key. -- Werner Heisenberg is driving down the autobahn. A police officer pulls him over. The officer says, "Excuse me, sir, do you know how fast you were going?" "No," replies Dr. Heisenberg, "but I know where I am." Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. Maranatha! <>< John McKown
