>> On 2016-04-30 02:08, wolfg...@alle-noten.de wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > I have a table with a row update trigger that is quite slow.
>> > The trigger finction basically sets some bits in a "changed" column
>> > depending on which values really changed.
>> > For some bulk updates it can be determined in advance that the
>> > trigger function will not have any effect.
>> > Is there any way to run an update query and specify that it should not
>> > activate the trigger.
>> > I know that I can disable the trigger and reenable it later;
>> > however other concurrent updates mights need it
>> 
>> 
>> I always disable the trigger, run the update, and enable the trigger
>> within a transaction. This locks the table and will prevent other
>> sessions from doing updates without the trigger (I run it during
>> off-hours if it is going to take more time than is acceptable).
>> 
Hi Stephen,
this is what I do now occasionally. However, I would like to be able to run 
some things right away.
The solutions in 
http://blog.endpoint.com/2015/07/selectively-firing-postgres-triggers.html
look very promising

Regards
Wolfgang Hamann





-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to