On 4 May 2016 at 06:46, dandl <da...@andl.org> wrote: > I'm a strong believer in putting the business code next to the data, not the > wrong > side of the object-relational divide. However, for many the challenge of > writing and > debugging SQL code is just too high!
Your source for this statement please? "For many" sounds rather like weasel-words to me. In my experience, a wide range of people, from beginners to experts, find SQL easy to write and debug. I'm afraid that the problem seems to me to be that your peg is rather too square. > Meanwhile I'm busy replacing SQL with Andl, which can do everything SQL gets > right and avoids most of the things it gets wrong. Look out for an > implementation > on Postgres real soon now. See > http://www.andl.org/2016/04/postgres-meet-andl/. Please, can you stop spamming every marginally-related topic in the list with this? I'm sure that anyone who's interested in this will have seen it in the thread you created that was actually marked with it in the subject. Geoff -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
