​

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:
> pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Steve Clark
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 9:56 AM
> To: pgsql <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Subject: [GENERAL] dumb question
>
> Hi List,
>
> I am a noob trying to do something that seems like it should be easy but I
> can't figure it out.
>
> I have a table like so:
>
> id | ref_id | sts
> ------------------
> 1  |        |  0
> 2  | 1      |  1
> 3  |        |  0
> 4  |        |  0
> 5  | 4      |  1
> 6  |        |  0
> 7  | 6      |  1
>
> I want to find the max(id) whose sts is 0 but whose id is not referenced
> by ref_id.
>

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dann Corbit <dcor...@connx.com> wrote:

> This is your request, translated directly into SQL
>
>         select max(id) from sometable where sts=0 and ref_id IS NULL
>
> Looking at your sample, it seems that sts is always 1 when ref_id exists,
> so it may possibly simplify to:
>
>         select max(id) from sometable where sts=0
>
>
​Please don't top-post.

​Your query would select "id=6", which is disqualified due to id=7...

For the record one reads:  "whose id is not referenced by ref_id" AS "id
NOT IN (ref_ids....)"; ref_id IS NULL means "that lacks a ref_id" and is
evaluated independent of the id.

David J.

Reply via email to