On 21/06/16 22:39, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> i'm cleaning up some queries for performance, and noticed that we never use
> precision beyond the second (ie, `timestamp(0)`) in our business logic.
>
> would there be any savings in storage or performance improvements from losing
> the resolution on fractional seconds, or are `timestamp(precision)`
> effectively the same for storage as `timestamp`? (based on docs, I assume
> the latter but wanted to check)
No, there are no space savings here.
=# select pg_column_size('now'::timestamptz(0)),
pg_column_size('now'::timestamptz);
pg_column_size | pg_column_size
----------------+----------------
8 | 8
(1 row)
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
