Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > While I agree with this, I'm trying to figure out why this isn't being > incorporated into glibc instead..?
Indeed --- it seems far more useful to integrate this sort of work at
the libc level than to ask applications to support their own replacements
for libc routines.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
