On 19/07/2016 12:41, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:37:10PM +0300, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Better to run, even slowly, than not run at all, or require special porting
team for every mysql client out there.
I'm not sure I agree. If you teach every naïve user that, when they
compare Postgres to MySQL, MySQL always wins, what you teach them is
"Postgres performance sucks."
It seems we have made already a verdict about mysql's code migrated to PostgreSQL being slow, although far fetched assumption in itself, even if we accept it, it is far more productive having one
dedicated small project for this mysql2pgsql conversion rather than N dedicated small teams for every mysql client out there.
Best regards,
A
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
