On 3 September 2016 at 04:36, dandl <da...@andl.org> wrote: > In any event, I am not backing his claims. I am simply asking: does anyone > have any facts to support or refute his 96% claim as applied to Postgres?
If that is scientific research he will publish evidence. If not, its just words and no refutation is required. Anybody can come here and discuss new features. Anybody. They just need to explain their thoughts and produce evidence for their assertions. Come on in, database researchers, we're open to rational contributions. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
