On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote: > Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> I don't see that on development HEAD. What version are you >> running? What is your setting for default_transaction_isolation? > > The subject says SERIALIZABLE, and I can see it on my 9.5.4 database: Oh, I see -- it doesn't happen if the row already exists at the start of the transaction, which it does if you run the OP's entire sample. If you skip the transaction in the middle of his sample, the error occurs. > test=> CREATE TABLE with_pk (i integer PRIMARY KEY); > CREATE TABLE > test=> START TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; > START TRANSACTION > test=> INSERT INTO with_pk VALUES (2), (2) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING; > ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update Or that, as a nice, self-contained test case. :-) -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
