On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > But yeah, the existing code raises false positive serialization > failures under SERIALIZABLE, and that's visible in the isolation test > I posted: there is actually a serial order of those transactions with > the same result.
I was under the impression that false positives of this kind are allowed by SSI. Why focus on this false positive scenario in particular? -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
