2016-10-23 20:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>:
> 2016-10-23 20:37 GMT+02:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <[email protected]>:
>
>> På søndag 23. oktober 2016 kl. 19:15:17, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>> På søndag 23. oktober 2016 kl. 17:06:57, skrev Guillaume Lelarge <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>> 2016-03-08 21:06 GMT+01:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 21:03:01, skrev David G. Johnston <
>>> [email protected]>:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 17:38:04, skrev Joshua D. Drake <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/08/2016 08:02 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
>>>> > På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 16:57:01, skrev Tom Lane <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>> >
>>>> > Andreas Joseph Krogh <[email protected]> writes:
>>>> > > What I'm looking for is "inverse -b" in an otherwise complete
>>>> > dump. Any plans
>>>> > > to add that?
>>>> >
>>>> > [ shrug... ] Nobody ever asked for it before.
>>>> >
>>>> > regards, tom lane
>>>> >
>>>> > It surely helps testing production-datasets which contain lots of
>>>> BLOBs
>>>> > where one wants to dump the production-data into a test-env. We have
>>>> > >1TB databases containing > 95% blobs so it would help us
>>>> tremendously
>>>> > to have this option.
>>>>
>>>> I have quite a few customers that would benefit from the ability to not
>>>> have blobs present in dumps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great! So how do we proceed to get "--no-blobs" added to pg_dump?
>>>> Maybe CommandPrompt and Visena should co-fund development of such an
>>>> addition, if it's accepted by -hackers?
>>>> We'd be willing to pay for such an addition for the 9.5 branch, as a
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this doesn't qualify as a bug fix - it is a new feature
>>> and thus is ineligible for inclusion in official 9.5
>>>
>>> David J.
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course. That's why I mentioned that, if possible, an unofficial patch
>>> to 9.5 could be developed, funded partly by Visena (my company). Given that
>>> someone is willing to do this of course.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That probably should look like the patch attached. It applies cleanly on
>> HEAD, and works AFAICT. If this patch seems interesting enough, I'll add it
>> to the next commit fest (note for myself, update the ref/pg_dump.sgml
>> documentation file).
>>
>> For Andreas' information, it also applies on 9.5, though I didn't check
>> if it worked afterwards.
>>
>>
>> +1 for adding it to the commitfest.
>>
>>
>>
> Done, https://commitfest.postgresql.org/11/833/
>
> It's almost scary how simple this patch is and noone ever got around to
>> implement it.
>>
>>
> Nobody had the time (like me, till now) or the motivation.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks, I'll test it on 9.5 soon.
>>
>>
>> It's totally OK for me to use 9.6 (now that it's released) to dump 9.5
>> DBs, so I'm all good with this patch, thanks!
>>
>
> Remember that, if it gets commited, it'll be for next release (aka 10),
> and not 9.6 and earlier.
>
>
New patch, this time with the documentation.
--
Guillaume.
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
index 371a614..83dc52f 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
@@ -145,6 +145,16 @@ PostgreSQL documentation
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
+ <term><option>-B</></term>
+ <term><option>--no-blobs</></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Exclude large objects in the dump.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
<term><option>-c</option></term>
<term><option>--clean</option></term>
<listitem>
diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
index 4da297f..dd93789 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
InitDumpOptions(&dopt);
- while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "abcCd:E:f:F:h:j:n:N:oOp:RsS:t:T:U:vwWxZ:",
+ while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "abBcCd:E:f:F:h:j:n:N:oOp:RsS:t:T:U:vwWxZ:",
long_options, &optindex)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
dopt.outputBlobs = true;
break;
+ case 'B': /* Don't dump blobs */
+ dopt.include_everything = false;
+ break;
+
case 'c': /* clean (i.e., drop) schema prior to create */
dopt.outputClean = 1;
break;
@@ -864,6 +868,7 @@ help(const char *progname)
printf(_("\nOptions controlling the output content:\n"));
printf(_(" -a, --data-only dump only the data, not the schema\n"));
printf(_(" -b, --blobs include large objects in dump\n"));
+ printf(_(" -B, --no-blobs exclude large objects in dump\n"));
printf(_(" -c, --clean clean (drop) database objects before recreating\n"));
printf(_(" -C, --create include commands to create database in dump\n"));
printf(_(" -E, --encoding=ENCODING dump the data in encoding ENCODING\n"));
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
