On 12/31/2016 08:25 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
David G. Johnston schrieb am 31.12.2016 um 16:51:
I wonder what the benefit of a typed table is and when this would be
useful?
But I'd say if you want a table with said structure you should plan on
droppign the original type after you've altered all references to it to
point to the new implicit type created with the table.
I am not planning to use it.
I am just wondering _if_ there is an advantage to this setup
Apparently at some point someone thought it would be useful, otherwise
it wouldn't have been implemented I guess.
I see it as completing the loop. A table creates a composite type, a
composite type creates a table. Not sure where that falls on the useful
scale.
Thomas
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
