On 06/08/2017 10:41 PM, Éric wrote: > > > >> Have you experimented with other queries that don't involve PostGIS? >> I'm wondering if your hook-installation code fails to work properly >> unless PostGIS was loaded first. This would be easier to credit if >> there are hooks both extensions try to get into. > > > I think you're right on Tom. It looks like I cannot reproduce the issue if I > start by calling a PostGIS function rather than a Pointcloud function. So it > may well be a conflict between PostGIS and Pointcloud. Both use fn_extra, and > that makes we wonder. This old thread [*] makes me wonder too! I still need > to figure out the bug, but I can see some light now! thanks > > [*] > <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/984D0F47C5FF4D0DB0D71A4F6EF670ED%40cleverelephant.ca#984d0f47c5ff4d0db0d71a4f6ef67...@cleverelephant.ca>
I now think that the performance bug is not related to the fn_extra thing. I had hope but not anymore :) I don't see where the Pointcloud and PostGIS extensions could conflict. -- Éric Lemoine Oslandia +33 1 86 95 95 55
<<attachment: eric_lemoine.vcf>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
