On 06/15/2017 09:49 AM, Paul Lavoie wrote:
Hi,

Long time user, new poster…

For assorted reasons I’ve decided to shard a database across multiple instances 
of postgresql running on the same machine. I’ve set up a lot of children 
servers with a ‘fdw’ user to work with the foreign data wrapper and created the 
child database along with a schema, and then on the main database go thru the 
process of:

CREATE SCHEMA myschema;
CREATE TABLE mytable (mycol TEXT);

CREATE EXTENSION postgres_fdw;
CREATE SERVER db001 FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (host 
‘localhost’, port ‘8001’, dbname = ‘db001’);
CREATE USER MAPPING FOR myuser SERVER db001 OPTIONS (user ‘fdw’, password 
‘XXX’);
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE myschema.mytable () INHERITS (mytable) SERVER db001 
OPTIONS (schema_name ‘myschema’, table_name ‘mytable’);

Attempts to SELECT from myschema.mytable then fail with a “relation 
“myschema.mytable” does not exist” error, and going into the child database 
shows no signs of any tables whatsoever.

I am assuming you are doing the above on the parent database.
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE does not actually create the table on the remote(child), it has to exist there already. It creates the table on parent and links it to the table on the remote(child).:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-createforeigntable.html

You will also want to pay attention to:

"If a schema name is given (for example, CREATE FOREIGN TABLE myschema.mytable ...) then the table is created in the specified schema. Otherwise it is created in the current schema. The name of the foreign table must be distinct from the name of any other foreign table, table, sequence, index, view, or materialized view in the same schema."


from the above link.


This is under Postgresql 9.6.3, with the software being tested on servers running 
MacOS, NetBSD/amd64, & Solaris/x86_64 (various combinations). I’ve tried 
removing the schema qualifications, redoing the host as properly remote rather than 
localhost, removing the port number, all without any signs of success. Oddly, the 
inverse of IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA appears to work.

I’m particularly curious as to how one would troubleshoot this scenario. I’m 
somewhat surprised at the CREATE FOREIGN TABLE returning success when it 
doesn’t appear to have done all the work - the Postgreql instance must be 
present, but it doesn’t complain if the database, never mind the schema, 
doesn’t exist.

If this turns out to be a bug, I’ll happily move to the bug mailing list to 
discuss further. But under the possibility I’m missing the obvious, I’d thought 
I’d try here first.

I’m going to go try the 10.0 beta now…

Thanks!

- Paul



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to