Thanks for the response Tom. I understand this would be a mammoth task. Would a more feasible approach be to introduce new types (say, TEXT2 and JSONB2 - or something better-sounding) which are the same as the old ones but add for support \u0000 and UTF 0? This would isolate nul-containing byte arrays to the implementations of those types and keep backward compatibility by leaving TEXT and JSONB alone.
Matt On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Matthew Byrne <mjw.by...@gmail.com> writes: > > Are there any plans to support \u0000 in JSONB and, relatedly, UTF code > > point 0 in TEXT? > > No. It's basically never going to happen because of the widespread use > of C strings (nul-terminated strings) inside the backend. Making \0 a > legal member of strings would break all those internal APIs, requiring > touching far more code than anyone would want to do. It'd likely break > a great deal of client-side code as well. > > regards, tom lane >
