Thank you! It works.

I’d very much like to know why this solution works. Could you please elaborate 
a bit more? I can’t quite understand what you mean by "can’t store the 
constant”. Since a view can’t store data, do you mean it can’t have a query 
that contains a constant? But isn’t 'public'  a constant too?

Also what’s the difference between ‘rolename'::regrole and 
'rolename'::text::regrole? Is it correct that in the former case, the 
conversion between the constant string and regrole happens in the sql parse 
time whereas in the latter case it happens in the run time? (Probably wrong, 
since looks like it can happen in the parse time too) Why it could work around 
the "cannot be used here” issue?

Thanks.

> On 5 Sep 2017, at 8:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> Glen Huang <hey...@gmail.com> writes:
>> I have this simple view definition:
>> CREATE TEMP VIEW user_schema AS
>>    SELECT nspname AS name FROM pg_namespace
>>    WHERE nspname = 'public' OR nspowner = ‘rolename'::regrole;
> 
>> But it fails to create the view by complaining: constant of the type 
>> "regrole" cannot be used here
> 
> It's not that you can't compare it, it's that you can't store the
> constant, for arcane reasons having to do with how the view's dependency
> on the role name would need to be represented.
> 
> You can work around it like this:
> 
> CREATE TEMP VIEW user_schema AS
>    SELECT nspname AS name FROM pg_namespace
>    WHERE nspname = 'public' OR nspowner = 'rolename'::text::regrole;
> 
> Here, the stored constant is just a string of type text, and the lookup
> in pg_authid will happen at runtime (and throw an error then, if you've
> dropped the role).
> 
>                       regards, tom lane



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to