On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org <i...@lucee.org> wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > > A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to > 10.0? > > > There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production. > > > Then think of it as 9.7.0 but with an easier name to pronounce ;) > The OP likely intended to say "x.0" version; which a "[9.7].0" version is just the same as a [10].0 version The contributors do an excellent job but the reality of this community is that a critical mass of people do not start seriously testing and using a new version until it is officially released. The first couple of bug-fix releases are thus, unfortunately, likely to be non-trivial as the masses flex the system at scales and using workloads that were not known or available to the developers. Its a balancing act for most and falling on the side of waiting for a few point releases before promoting to production is, I suspect, common. David J.
