At 7:28 +0200 5/2/2001, Christian Marschalek wrote: >Maybe a AMD Athlon 1.33GHZ would be better.. It's a very fast CPU and I >don't know if PostgreSQL runns faster on dual since I don't know if it >can handle the load balancing? >Well.. GIG of Ram is never bad... :) I would think that dual CPU's would help immensely due to the multiple postgres processes running simultaneously. -- Cafard, [EMAIL PROTECTED] qu'est-ce que tu penses? AIM:pr0j2501 Matt Kane's Brain http://mkb.n3.net ===jive turkey http://jive-turkey.n3.net=== ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configuration fo... Christian Marschalek
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... mkb
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Albertson, Chris
- Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Dave Cramer
- Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configu... Sean Chittenden
- [GENERAL] Re: Ideal hardware con... Sergey E. Volkov
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)
- Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configu... Michelle Murrain
- RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configurati... Steve Ackerman
- Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configu... Tony Grant