On 26 Jun 2003 at 3:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:17:12AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >> > I have a table with 13 fields. Is that
> >> > too many fields for one table.
> >> > Mark
> >> Thirteen? No way. I've got you beat with 21:
> > Pfft! Is *that* all? I've got a table with 116 fields.
> I *knew* a number of these responses would be forthcoming... :)
I remember somebody posting a database schema with 500 fields.
Don't worry as long as it works. When you have problems, post it on
performance. First advice you would get is to normalize it..:-)
Bye
Shridhar
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em! -- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver",
stardate 1514.2
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
