I take it, following this thread, is that REPLACE is not in the SQL standard?

Bruno Wolff III wrote:

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:56:18 -0400,
Edmund Dengler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Wasn't there a feature in some SQL database which was the equivalent of
UPDATE OR INSERT ... based on the primary key? Would this accomplish what
you want (I know that I have a desire for this feature a couple of times,
as I simply have code or triggers to essentially do the equivalent)? Is
this a desirable feature for Postgresql?



I remember people asking for the equivalent of MYSQL's REPLACE command in previous threads.

Another alternative is allowing the clients to determine what do do after an
error so that you could try an insert first and then do an update if it
failed without aborting your transaction.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
     subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
     message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to