Mark Harrison writes: > Is there a way to optimize count(*) such that it does not have > to do a sequential scan?
No. If you need to count a lot, you need to store the information
separately.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
