Frank van Vugt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did I miss this future necessity on the TODO-list ('cause I did check...) or
> is it simply not on there (yet) ?
It's not there; it should be. Something like
* Need better (safer, less prone to unnecessary failures) scheme for
ensuring CREATE DATABASE gets a consistent copy of the template database
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
