Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> We recently decided we had to forbid foreign-key references from temp > >> tables to permanent tables because of this effect. I wonder whether > >> we won't end up forbidding temp tables as children of permanent tables > >> too. > > > Yep, I think we will have to do that. TODO item? > > Plan B would be to arrange for the planner to ignore temp tables of > other backends whenever it is searching for child tables. Then the > behavior would be predictable: you never see any rows inserted in other > people's temp child tables (and cannot update or delete 'em, either). > I'm not sure if this is the behavior the OP wanted, but it seems at > least marginally useful.
Added to TODO: * Ignore temporary tables from other session when processing inheritance -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match