On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 18:43, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why are we not using Tsearch2?
> >
> > Because nobody has built it yet? Oleg's stuff is nice, but we want
> > something that we can build into the existing web sites, not a standalone
> > site ...
> >
> > I keep searching the web hoping someone has come up with a 'tsearch2'
> > based search engine that does the spidering, but, unless its sitting right
> > in front of my eyes and I'm not seeing it, I haven't found it yet :(
> >
> > Out of everything I've found so far, mnogosearch is one of the best ... I
> > just wish I could figure out where the bottleneck for it was, since, from
> > reading their docs, their method of storing the data doesn't appear to be
> > particularly off. I'm tempted to try their caching storage manager, and
> > getting away from SQL totally, but I *really* want to showcase PostgreSQL
> > on this :(
>
> Well, PostgreSQL is being un-showcased in the current setup, that's for
> sure. :-(
In fact this is a very bad advertisement for postgres
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 1467551
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
