On Sunday 11 January 2004 22:05, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> David Garamond wrote:
> > Are there any drawbacks of using BYTEA for PK compared to using a
> > primitive/atomic data types like INT/SERIAL? (like significant
> > performance hit, peculiar FK behaviour, etc).
> >
> > I plan to use BYTEA for GUID (of course, temporarily I hope, until
> > PostgreSQL officially supports GUID data type), since it seems to be
> > the most convenient+compact compared to other data types currently
> > available. I use GUIDs for most PK columns.
>
> GUID? Isn't that really nothing more than an MD5 on a sequence?
>
> SELECT (MD5(NEXTVAL('my_table_seq'))) AS my_guid;
I think the point of a GUID is it's supposed to be unique across any number of
machines without requiring those machines to coordinate their use of GUID
values.
I think the typical approach is to use something like:
hash_fn( network_mac_address || other_hopefully_unique_constant ||
sequence_val )
and make sure that the probability of getting collisions is acceptably low.
ISTR a long discussion a year or two back on one of the lists, for those that
are interested.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
