--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah-hah. The win32 hackers should confirm this, but
> my recollection is
> that sync/fsync are no-ops under Cygwin (one of the
> several reasons
> we would never recommend that port for production
> use). So this would
> fit the assumption that the 7.4 code was simply not
> syncing.
>
Sounds reasonable. However, I don't see the same
performance hit while doing bulk database operations
(ie: inserts, deletes, updates). Is that expected
behavior? Do vacuum operations fsync()/_commit() more
often?
Regards,
Shelby Cain
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
