David Garamond wrote:
Consider someone who creates a long list of:

 MD5( "postgres" + "aaaaaaaa" )
 MD5( "postgres" + "aaaaaaab" )
 MD5( "postgres" + "aaaaaaac" )
 ...

Now if he has access to other people's pg_shadow, he can compare the hashes with his dictionary. Replacing "postgres" with a random salt defeats this dictionary attack (and thus he will have to resort to brute force).

But surely you have to store the random salt in pg_shadow too? Or am I missing something?


--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to