Mike Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Wouldn't a good solution to the "bogus" and rogue groups be a creation
> of a new domain in the big 8? Suppose there was a rogue.* domain.
> All the groups that were rogue would be placed there by the usenet
> providers. Therefore those customers who demanded certain rogue groups
> would have them, only they would be moved under rogue. Say someone
> sets up a rogue group like comp.muffins. All the usenet providers
> would then just move it to rogue.comp.muffins.
>
> That way their status is clear to all subscribers, the commercial
> usnet providers would have a well managed big 9, and would not be
> forced to choose between having a well managed hierarchy or doing
> carrying the groups customers demand.
You frighten me. ;-)
--
Bill
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
