>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> >>The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql
> >>groups for consideration to be included into the big 8. However there
> >>are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be
> >>there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly
> >>doubt Marc would want to eliminate them.
I think Marc understands by now that these lists won't be eliminated. It's a
parallel process. Let's start with a few and create the other groups down
the road. An RFD with 21 groups has a good chance to be rejected, not
because they are not relevant, just because it's too many at one time. I
assume a second RFD should be 'filed' in 6 months with the remaining groups,
and should be nothing more than a cruise.
Nax
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
