In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Mike Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> comp.databases.postgresql.general > >How about just comp.databases.postgresql or (shudder) >comp.databases.postgresql.misc?
The whole point of this proposal is that c.d.p.general *already* exists in an unofficial sense on some servers, and that it should be made "official." Creating a new group with a different name will simply confuse matters on those servers that already carry c.d.p.general. -- Jon Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Presbyterian College Dept. of Physics and Computer Science Clinton, South Carolina USA ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
