On 3 Dec 2004 20:34:36 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G. >> Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, >>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one >>>carried by several of the large usenet servers. >> >> What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*? >> >> > >Fiat-only by Marc. ;-) I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy has a hierarchy czar. That is the most straightforward way to manage a hierarchy. I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only the most straightforward. It doesn't address the question of what happens if the czar disappears, for instance. - - Bob McClenon ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
