On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:16:28PM +1100, Russell Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:39 am, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:31:21AM -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
>
> > Some have suggested that PostgreSQL should use a weaker lock on the
> > referenced key, but that hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Are there actually any problems with only getting a AccessShareLock?
Yes, because there is no infrastructure to get any type of lock save
an exclusive lock (not sure to which lmgr lock type is equivalent) on a
per-row basis.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"Ni aun el genio muy grande llegarķa muy lejos
si tuviera que sacarlo todo de su propio interior" (Goethe)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
