Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:35:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> So that part of it can be solved fairly easily.
> Should I submit a patch? It should be only a few additional lines > in PLy_procedure_munge_source(). Would you apply it only to HEAD, > or would it be considered a bug fix that REL8_0_STABLE could get > as well? It might be nice to have it in 8.0.2, whenever that comes > out. I think it would be reasonable to back-patch a small fix to convert CRLF. The sort of rewrite Marco is considering, I wouldn't back-patch. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend