Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> So it seems our entire SMP problem was that global lock. Nice.
Yeah, I was kind of expecting to see the LockMgrLock up next, but
it seems we're still a ways away from having a problem there. I guess
that's because we only tend to touch locks once per query, whereas
we're grabbing and releasing buffers much more.
>From the relatively small absolute value of Mark's queries/sec numbers,
I suppose he is testing some fairly heavyweight queries (big enough
to not emphasize per-query overhead). I wonder what the numbers would
look like with very small, simple queries. It'd move the stress around
for sure ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
