[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:54:28AM -0600, Guy Rouillier wrote: []
>> The service_plane table is a reference table, i.e., a fixed set of
>> values used only to validate foreign keys. So the code doesn't have
>> any update statements on that table.
>
> And idea that just came up around here that sounds like a pretty neat
> workaround, which we're gonna try, is to drop the foreign key
> constraints, and just use a check constraint for the allowed values.
> If the cardinality of the reference table is small, this is much
> faster than using foreign keys and solves your problem. With the
> drawback that if you update the reference table (if you keep it), you
> mustn't forget to also update the check constraints in more than one
> place.
Frank and Bruno, thanks for the idea. I'm going to give this a try. I
tried the INITIALLY DEFERRED and I'm getting some strange duplicate key
errors. This sounds like a better idea in this scenario, as our
reference table only has a dozen unique values.
--
Guy Rouillier
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
