> > A & (B | (New OperatorTheNextWordMustFollow York))
>
I had thought about this before myself. Alas I have never had the time to
properly investigate implementing such a feature.
:(
A & (B | (New + York))
Something like that?
> Actually, I love that idea. Oleg, would it be possible to create a
> tsquery operator that understands proximity? Or, how allowing a
> predicate to the current '&' op, as in '&[dist<=1]' meaning "next
> token follows with a max distance of 1". I imagine that it would
> only be useful on unstripped tsvectors, but if the lexem position is
> already stored ...
>
Would the proximity go in both directions? Or just forward? What about tokens
that come before? Just a thought.
Andy
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
