Luca Pireddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote a trigger function with the intent of preventing the deletion of a 
> parent record when a referencing record would not allow it.  However, the 
> result is that the referencing record stays, but the referenced one is gone, 
> so that my foreign key constraint is not respected.

[ shrug... ] So don't do that.  Triggers can break FK constraints in any
number of ways beside this one (eg, changing the data in the record).
If we tried to prevent that I think we'd either waste a lot of cycles or
cripple the trigger feature ... quite possibly both.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to