General consensus is to use 10-25% of server memory for shared_buffers, but much of that consensus was generated before 8.0, which introduced a much more sophisticated management scheme for shared_buffers. Basically, you need to do some testing to see what setting will work best. Reports back to here or -performance would be appreciated.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:16:04PM -0600, Tony Caduto wrote: > Hi, > we have a client that has a table that holds transactions from sales and > it is now at 10 million rows. it was in MS Access and they could only > hold 2 million rows, so we installed Postgres for them and they dumped > 10 million rows from the mainframe into Postgres. > > I was just wondering if anyone had suggestions for optimizing the > postgresql.conf file and how much OS shared memory I should > reserve(RedHat is set by default to have 128mb of shared memory). > > We are running on RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 AS on a dual processor P4 > Xeon with 2.5 gb of ram. > > The table in question has 20 fields and I could post the DDL of the > table if needed. > > Thanks, > > > -- > Tony Caduto > AM Software Design > Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql > http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
