Tom Lane wrote:

Also I'd suggest trying

        select year from [table] group by year

which is capable of using a hash aggregation approach; that will likely
beat either of these plans.

Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the planner consider the same plan for the OP's original query:

  select distinct year from [table]

Aren't these equivalent (except for the order)?

Thanks.

- John Burger


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to