Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Well, I notice that the SQL standard defines something called WITH, so
> what you want is something like:

> WITH OLD AS ( SELECT blah )
> DO
> ( UPDATE <rule1>
> ; DELETE <rule2> )

I think it'd be a mistake to assume that WITH would fix Markus'
complaint.  I haven't studied the spec in detail but I think that WITH
acts largely like a macro too.  It certainly doesn't have the behavior
of "evaluate this just once", as one of the prime uses for it is in
recursive query definition.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to