On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:25:19AM -0700, Shelby Cain wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > >From: Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Shelby Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Postgres general mailing list > >><pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 11:46:42 AM > >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE > > > >Well, sometimes it's not that easy. How would you handle a batch > >processing system which stores the incoming requests in a queue table in > >the data base, and then periodically processes a batch of it, with the > >additional constraint that it is allowed to process at most 1000 at a > >time so it won't produce a too long running transaction ? Suppose the > >processing is quite costly, and the queue can have bursts of incoming > >requests which then have to be slowly processed... the requests are > >coming from the web and must be processed asynchronously, the insert > >into the data base must be very fast. > > I can't imagine a case where a properly tuned Postgresql installation with > appropriate hardware backing it couldn't handle that particular kind of > workload pattern. However, I usually work with Oracle so tables used as > queues don't have the same performance issues you'd run into with Postgresql.
Just try and do (what should stay) a small queue table in the same database as long-running reporting transactions. As long as a long-running report is going you might as well suspend all vacuuming on that queue table, because it won't do you any good; the report transaction means that vacuum can't remove anything. I've seen a case where a queue table should always fit into a single database page; 2 at most. But because some transactions will run for a minute or two, that table is normally about 40 pages, almost entirely all dead space. Of course the same problem affects all the indexes on that table as well. I can't imagine how bad this would be if the database actually had hour-long reports that had to run... and luckily the system is quiet at night when pg_dump runs. > Regardless, this type of queue problem can also be tackled by having your > data layer persisting the input from the web in memory (which maintains a low > perceived response time to the client) and posting to the table as fast as > the database allows. Uh, and just what happens when your web front-end crashes then?? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
