On 6/8/06, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Marlowe) writes:
> To me, the real argument is, "Is SQL so lacking that it should be
> replaced". In what REAL measurable ways is SQL lacking so badly we
> should toss it and start over? It's not perfect, that's for sure.
> But what's the investment on starting over, and the possible
> traction of a non-SQL database in a largely SQL driven market?
The only visible alternative, at this point, is Tutorial D, and it
doesn't particularly excite me...
Alphora. I don't think it meets the definition of market traction
(and it overlays on top of sql), but it's pretty neat.
Merlin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
