Michael ,list You are you are right, thanks a lot for your help and tinme. best regards MDC --- Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:37:19PM -0300, marcelo > Cortez wrote: > > > This isn't a trigger function. Are you sure > "trigger" is the > > > word you meant? > > > > yes i do > > I see: the function you originally posted is called > by a trigger > function. In any case the answer is the same: > functions can't start > or end transactions because they're already being > executed in the > context of an outer transaction. My previous > message mentioned > using dblink as a way around that, but that's not > necessarily good > design -- one problem is that if the outer > transaction rolls back > then transactions that have already been committed > over a dblink > connection won't be rolled back. Doing transaction > control from > outside the functions would probably be better. > > -- > Michael Fuhr > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > __________________________________________________ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
