In response to Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml > > > > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article > > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM. > > Seems a little fishy to me. > > There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't > manage to finish it (c't says connection pooling didn't work). > > See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php > > MySQL's winning submission was by a team from MySQL AB.
It's just kind of a shame that we didn't have a chance to put together a serious entry ... This is the first I've heard of the contest. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq