In response to Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> > Seems a little fishy to me.
>
> There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't
> manage to finish it (c't says connection pooling didn't work).
>
> See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php
>
> MySQL's winning submission was by a team from MySQL AB.
It's just kind of a shame that we didn't have a chance to put together
a serious entry ...
This is the first I've heard of the contest.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
