Csaba Nagy wrote:
The code is possible to be executed in parallel by multiple threads, on
different connections, or in sequence on the same connection. I would
expect it in both cases to work correctly... in manual tests I was able
to create in parallel temporary tables named identically in different
connections, and on the same connection after rolling back the
transaction which created the first table... so I don't know what to try
to trigger this.
Any ideas what's the problem ?
Are you sure that you're not re-using an existing connection from a pool?
--
Alban Hertroys
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
magproductions b.v.
T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede
// Integrate Your World //
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
