In response to Bo Lorentsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi ...
>
> I have been trying to find a replication to a payment system at the
> company I work, and Slony-I is of cause the first thing that game into
> my attention. But when reading chapter 23.3 in the PG manual, there is
> this comment of PITR used as a replication tool.
>
> I also saw the "pgpitrha" project, and this sounds really nice too, but
> is this a good way to go ? Will PITR be more replication friendly
> in the future or even form the basis for a future buildin async
> replication form ?
>
> I may be naive, but to me it sound like we/I only need some kind of
> protocol (or API in postgres) to move PITR data from one server to
> another, and we could end up with a nice async replication system.
>
> pros :
> - DDL replications
> - low overhead
> - no trickers
>
> Cons:
> - binary alike master slave
- No reliability. On slow days, WAL logs could take a long time to
rotate, so small but important transactions might not be replicated
for a long time.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
