On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:39:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > It would be handy for things like pgpool and Continuent, which > > could reliably distinguish up front the difference between a > > transaction that can write and one that can safely be sliced up > > and dispatched to read-only databases. > > Yes, I think that would be the use case. I wish someone were to > implement that.
I think you meant "would" rather than "were to." ;) I've brought it up with the pgpool people :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
