>>> Why do you want to lock at all?
>
>> It's long and sad story ;(
>
>If you don't explain what you're trying to accomplish, you're unlikely
>to get useful advice.
Tom,
I need table level locks for cooperative usage in my application.
LOCK TABLE table_name in EXCLUSIVE MODE
and
LOCK TABLE table_name in SHARED MODE
perfectly suit my needs.
The only drawback - interference with VACUUM and other system processes
with obvious performance/response time penalty.
So I need very simple thing: locks behave exactly like EXCLUSIVE and SHARED
I can use to control my own application processes.
Honestly I've already introduced such locks with syntax
LOCK TABLE table_name in APPLICATION EXCLUSIVE MODE
and
LOCK TABLE table_name in APPLICATION SHARED MODE
Does publishing of this patch make any sense?
I can explain what is the reason of table locks usage (briefly I need this
thing to provide transaction isolation).
Story is long and sad indeed, though I can retell it if it seems to be useful.
Thanks a lot for your response.
--
Best regards
Ilja Golshtein
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
